The opinion for the Court avoided creating a bright line rule concerning where the speech occurs. L.'s words as unworthy of … robust First Amendment protections," but concluded "sometimes it is necessary to protect the superfluous in order to preserve the necessary." And he identified a key government interest the school administration apparently overlooked: to prepare students for citizenship, "the school itself has an interest in protecting a student's unpopular expression, especially when the expression takes place off campus." (emphasis added).
![school license of speak it ispeech school license of speak it ispeech](http://www.arsov.net/SoundBytes/Images/2014-03/Cubase-HalionSonicSE2.jpg)
503 (1969), and held the school could not punish a high school cheerleader's off-campus Snapchat message to friends.ĭespite the vulgar nature of the message-"Fuck school fuck softball fuck cheer fuck everything" with an image of the student and her friend with their middle fingers raised-the Court found the teenager's critical opinion of school issues worthy of "robust First Amendment protections." Justice Breyer observed it "might be tempting to dismiss B. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S.
![school license of speak it ispeech school license of speak it ispeech](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y8rnmRKqr_c/hqdefault.jpg)
In an 8-1 decision, the Court strongly reaffirmed the landmark case Tinker v.
#SCHOOL LICENSE OF SPEAK IT ISPEECH FREE#
2038 (2021), upholding students' free speech rights for the first time since 1969.
![school license of speak it ispeech school license of speak it ispeech](https://townsquare.media/site/812/files/2017/12/pump.jpg)
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Mahanoy Area School District v.